BMW NineT Forum banner
1 - 9 of 72 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,037 Posts
If I was riding down the highway at 70mph I'd much rather get a flat on a tubeless tire than a tubed tire. Tubeless wheels are built with a safety lip to prevent to tire from coming off the rim. Tube type wheels do not have that safety lip. I've never seen a tube type rim WITH a safety lip, but maybe BMW is different than the rest of the industry. Tubes are better than tubeless for off road, since you can easily remove the tire from the rim and reseat the bead, as there is no safety lip to get in the way.

For street use, and high speed, I would expect tube type tires to run hotter, and the higher weight of a tube + tire versus just the tire must be detrimental to the ride quality and handling.

1/2 seems to be enough to fix a leak and not enough to put the wheel out of balance when I get flying.
The fluid should help with the balance, not take away from it. For years I ran Ride-On TPS ( a competitor to Slime) in both my tubed and tubeless bikes. It helps seal a flat and it helps with the balance. I usually got more mileage out of a tire with TPS in it. I balanced my wheel by itself, then for the next 100,000km I never balanced the wheel with the tire installed. I simply put in Ride-On TPS. I rode the Continental Divide Trail from Canada to Mexico and of the 4 tube type bikes on the trip, three had Ride-On and one did not. We fixed flats on his bike three times. None of the other bikes got a flat. Near the end of the trip we were gearing up to leave the campground and just as we were about to pull out he spotted a nail in my tire. I pulled the nail out with pliers, fired the bike up and rode off.

A few weeks after getting home I was cleaning up the bikes and servicing them, new tubes, new tires, etc. I was curious to see what the liquid looked like in my tire after 5,000 miles so I cut the tube open. I was surprised to find a two inch long cactus needle in the tube and a small finishing nail.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,037 Posts
Sorry Gap but I go down the service road at 70+
I don't understand that reference. Do service roads have a lower chance of puncturing your tire than a 'highway'? I've ridden dirt at 90mph, and pavement at 10mph. A puncture can happen anywhere at any speed.

I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I was basing my opinion on the knowledge gained from 20 years in the motorcycle industry, years of training, about a hundred industry trade shows and training from more than one motorcycle tire manufacturer. I know that when I am out on the trail and get a flat on a tube tire and the tire is stuck to the rim all I have to do is roll the bike a little and the tire will break free, assuming I was able to stop before it already came off causing me to crash. On a tubeless rim that doesn't happen. I've ridden 30 miles on a tire with no air and a 2 inch hole in it. It never let go. The safety lip is to help in sealing the bead against the rim while inflating, and to keep the tire in place during air loss. I've had multiple flats on tubed wheels where the tire came clean off the rim while I was still moving. That's when I started using the tire sealant I mentioned above.

As for the air coming out slower with a tube? My tubes aren't loaded with artificial intelligence. When they get punctured by a 1/4" screw the air comes out at the same speed as it it does through the same 1/4" hole in the tire. The air can only escape out through the puncture hole, but once a tube is punctured, air can escape through the puncture AND through all 36 spoke holes that aren't sealed. The only difference at that point is the safety lip, which holds the bead of the tire far better than none at all. An empty tube is doing nothing to hold the tire on the rim. In retrospect though, I would be curious to see the inside rim profile on an R9T that runs tubes. Given the tire sizes we run, and that there are no tube type tires in that size, BMW may have put the safety lip on its tube wheels to accommodate the bead profile of the tubeless tire being used. Take a picture of the rim next time you change tires, I'd be curious to see if they did. The bead design on a tubeless tire isn't the same as a tubed tire, and the rim profile must match the bead.

The real disadvantage for tubes in the R9T is that it still uses tubeless tires. When you run a tube in a tubeless tire the industry guideline is to treat the setup as one load rating and one speed rating less than the tubeless tire says it can handle due to the added heat. When buying tubes, you also need to make sure to get tubes that are rated for Radial tires. Most tubes are not, which is why it is hard to find the right tubes for these bikes. Back when I had my shop Bridgestone and Metzeler were the only companies making a radial approved tube (edited) for 150/70 and 170/60 tires.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,037 Posts
Did you mean radial approved tube instead of tire ? I’m confused.
Yes, I did. That was a typo and I have edited it in my post. Thanks for catching it. You are correct that overall Tubeless is preferred.. lighter, safer, easier to fix a flat, etc. UNLESS you are in the middle of a trail off road or on an around the world trip in a third world country, where it is much easier to dismount and remount a tube tire. Off road also still prefers spoke wheels, and strong lightweight spoke wheels are almost all tube type, hence the popularity. You can seal the spokes, but then you lose the ability to replace a spoke out on the trial. I had to replace three on a trip out west when I hit a badger hole at 60mph. If I had sealed my spokes to run tubeless I would have been screwed.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,037 Posts
What's the issue using a tube designed for radial tires? I know ADV tires can be purchased either tube type or tubeless and there does seem to be an issue with finding tubes that size. Does it have to be a special tube as well?
If you have radial tires, you should have a tube rated for radial tires. They are stronger and designed to flex like a radial tire, and are better at dealing with the heat.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,037 Posts
Why would you want to use a tube in a tubeless tire ?
On a bike like yours you don't have a choice. The wheels require tubes, but the tires are tubeless. Nobody makes a 170/60-17 in a tube type, except maybe a Harley branded Dunlop.

How is the inside of the tubeless tire made commpatable to a tube, and where does the heat come from, …friction ? ….and last: if the tube in a tubeless tire does get hot ..how is it ..that it makes a difference ..if it’s in a tubeless tire in the first place … where’s the advantage ? ..or disadvantage for that matter ? ………………………………..Blitz
The inside of a tube and tubeless tire are different. There is an air proof skin or seal on the inside of a tubeless tire so that air pressure does not seep through the rubber. If you mount a tube type tire on a tubeless rim the pressure will drop significantly over the next few days. I've also seen a few tubeless tires that have what looks like a small foil patch inside the tire, which is actually an inventory control item. You have to remove these if you are running a tube or else it will wear the tube at that location. Tubes get hot in any tire, tube or tubeless style. There is no difference. A tube type tire is rated for speed and load based on the knowledge that it will have the required tube in it. A Tubeless tire does not take into consideration the heat generated from the tube as it isn't required, but when you put one in the tubeless tire to conform to the requirements of the wheel, then the heat it (and all tubes) generates needs to be taken into account, and that is why the general practice is to lower the speed and load rating of that tire under that circumstance.

Tire manufacturers have all sorts of rules we have all heard before.. never mix brands, never mix radial and non-radial, use the right tube, etc.. Despite these rules, they sometimes get broken by the moto OEM's, but in those cases they have tested that oddball and found that it performed to the required standard. A good example is the F800 which for years had a 90/90-21 on the front and 150/70-17 on the rear, and the bikes came from the factory with a bias front and radial rear. Not every manufacturer makes a radial 90/90-21, or a bias 170/60-17. They are getting a little more available now, but for years there was no choice but to mix bias and radial on that bike. There were issues with people buying replacements for their bikes and confusing tube type with tubeless, and seeing two tires of the same brand and model with two different price, and like all people they chose the cheaper one. As a result people would mount this cheaper tube type 90/90-21 on their tubeless wheel and wonder why it wouldn't hold air.

Mixing brands, and even models within a brand should be avoided unless you understand the differences and can plan accordingly. I've got Pirelli's on my R1250GSA right now. I can get the rear tire over till it is at the edge completely and will run out of tire long before the front ever gets to the edge. I know if I put an Avon Storm 3D on the front and keep the Pirelli on the rear then the front will run out of tread first which is more dangerous. Different tires have different profiles. As long as you are aware and ride accordingly then go for it, but since the US is so well known for being the land of litigation, the lawyers have to have those disclaimers to not mix brands.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,037 Posts
I just saw a video from Continental saying you cannot run a tube in a tubeless rim at all. Note I said rim. Apparently it's ok to run a tube in a tube-type rim with a tubeless tire, according to some sources, but never in a tubeless rim.
I have learned a lot from Jeff, shown in that video. Guys knows his stuff. He's also a heck of a rider. We had a blast at March Moto Madness the year the TKC70 was released, riding around on trails to see how tough of a terrain we could get through with those tires. If he says "you cannot run a tube in a tubeless rim at all" then that probably answers the question as to whether or not there is a safety lip on the R Nine T Classic spoke wheels. I guess there isn't... I'd still like to see a picture though next time someone takes a tire off.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,037 Posts
My question is: What if you did run a tube in a tubeless tire on an tubeless rim and the tubeless tire was sealing properly to the “special rim seal” on the special tubeless rim …but then the tube inside the tubeless tire with the tubeless rim went flat .. what difference would it make ?
Interesting scenario. Assuming black magic of some sort that the tube inside got compromised WITHOUT the tire getting compromised, let's say a patch gave up or some foreign object in the tire at time of install wore a hole through the tube... then you would most likely still lose air, albeit maybe a little slower since the hole in the rim where the valve stem passes through isn't sealed to the rim. I think if it lost enough air pressure to allow the valve stem to move away from the rim surface, it would then leak out very quickly.

If you’re running those weird ADV rims with outside spokes on the wheels ..(sorry fellas, they just look wrong).
Yeah they certainly look different and since the rim thickness is larger then they stick out further from the tire surface and are more susceptible to scratches and dings when riding off road, through gravel, sand, etc. There are other style of tubeless spoke wheels though.

Tire Wheel Automotive tire Motorcycle Motor vehicle
.
Wheel Tire Automotive tire Motor vehicle Light
.

Tire Wheel Automotive tire Synthetic rubber Motor vehicle



My all time favourite for coolest looking wheel has got to be the MV Augusta F3 tubeless spoke wheel, with a single side swing arm and SINGLE SIDED SPOKES. The engineering behind that amazes me.

Tire Wheel Automotive tire Bicycle tire Motor vehicle
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,037 Posts
If you have tubes just carry a patch kit. If you can see where the flat was created (nail, screw, etc. ) then put that part of the tire facing forward on a front tire and backward on a arear tire to give you more room to work, and using tire irons just pop off the bead on one side from the top to the bottom. Reach in and pull the damaged part of the tube out, patch it, slide it back in and pump it up. There is no need to remove the wheel to patch a tube.

If you have tubeless tires, it will be far less effort to simply plug the tire than it would be to install a tube. If you wanted to put a tube in, you'll need to remove the valve stem and TPMS sensor to make room for the valve stem of the tube.

In both of those cases, having the tire (or tube) filled with the proper amount of Ride-On TPS or Sahara Moto flat sealant would probably prevent the majority of average punctures.
 
1 - 9 of 72 Posts
Top