Joined
·
167 Posts
Is there any reason to, or not to, use the kill switch for normal operations?
Yes, Stubborn, other than.... I'm not familiar with what effects using the kill switch has while leaving electronics turned on. I just want to know my Nine T as well as I can.Other than when falling off the bike?
I've never found a need to use the kill switch on a day to day basis, by using it to stop the engine (in normal) conditions, You then have to turn off the ignition switch as well! Thus requiring the use of two switch's, when in fact one will do the same job. The ignition switch. IMO the kill switch is for emergency engine stopIs there any reason to, or not to, use the kill switch for normal operations?
good habit , in the mean time the engine provides a continuous brake. Always useful parking down-/uphill.Over the course of time most BMW riders have not used the kill switch other than an emergency shut off.
Long distance riders have actually dismounted their bikes without putting the sidestand down. I found that hard to believe but after a 1000 mile day in the saddle, I was weary, and almost got off the bike without putting down the sidestand.
As a result, many BMW riders downshift to 1st, use the sidestand as their kill switch, as it accomplishes two obvious things: kills the engine and provides support. Easy habit to get used to IMO.
I agree but somewhere along the line this mode of braking has somehow fallen into disfavor with many. The logic presented, and at face value offers what appears to be reasonable, is that brake pads a lot less expensive than engine parts (e.g. overstressing, no rev-limiting in a bad downshift, slipper clutches assist) and of course the ungainly 'jolt' of a bad downshift. Ah well, I grew up in an error when the cool blip of the throttle while downshifting (in a car) with the usually not needed double-clutch (but was cool) and yeah, we had synchro-mesh then.engine braking always helps
even in cars i use engine braking under situations where i must. what ever works.